The Actor in Television
During television’s toddler years of the 1930s-1940s before Murrow and his legendary team shook the world, news production was often put under actors and personalities in handbooks of the day rather than standing on its own right.
From a 1940s production textbook, some suggestions that were given to television news commentators, err, actors of the day from the chapter titled “The Actor in Television.”
News broadcasters are prone to be the most flagrant violators of the rule of naturalness. Concerned solely with the importance of the copy before them, they run on, head down, for the assigned fifteen minutes, with scarcely a glance at the audience. If the television set owners are to expect nothing more than this bird’s-eye view of the news analyst’s bald spot, it would be far better to use radio. Even in the limited field of acting available to the commentator, the newsman can do much to benefit his presentation. First of all, whenever possible he should forget the script before him. If the subject matter is such as to require exact delivery, he should school himself to read ahead so as to be able to deliver his lines more or less directly to the camera. If he is permitted to “ad lib,” all the better, for then he becomes more like a visitor in the home and less like a town crier. Let him be natural smile, even stop to run his fingers through his hair, or light a cigarette. Let him feel, and make the audience feel, that he is conversing with each one individually, not reading the evening paper while he makes his scheduled visit.
In an attempt to relieve the monotony of telecasting individuals, WBKB (now WBBM-TV), in Chicago, has experimented somewhat successfully with the use of more than one commentator and has thus developed a conversational setup with an interesting background. Cubberly and Campbell, for instance, have adopted a typical newsroom locale and normally play their bit in shirt sleeves, to the accompaniment of typewriters and telephones.
This double feature allows one actor to consider his lines as well as the picture. While his colleague is talking, there is an opportunity for him to develop well-thought-out questions and answers to sustain the interest of the audience.
Ann Hunter, another extremely popular commentator of the Chicago air, prefers to play her bit solo, and does it so successfully that she bids fair to rank high in the lists of popular newspeople in the postwar period. Ann Hunter uses the direct “ad lib” technique, and by talking directly to the lens she becomes not only an interesting commentator but a particularly charming and acceptable picture as well.






